domingo, 15 de noviembre de 2009

APARECEN RESTOS ARQUEOLÓGICOS EN EL CASCO DE GÁLDAR.

Las obras de mejora de la zona comercial abierta del casco de Gáldar, que desde principios de esta semana se están ejecutando en la calle Artemi Semidán, han sacado a la luz, algunos restos arqueológicos.

Los trabajadores de la obra avisaron este miércoles por la mañana, de la aparición de una estructura, al abrir una zanja en la calle.

Hasta la zona se trasladaron arqueólogos de la empresa Arqueocanarias que dirige Valentín Barroso, que están investigando el origen de estos restos.

En concreto, han aparecido los restos de un muro y de una acequia. Según las primeras estimaciones, se descarta que el muro sea de la época prehispánica, ya que tiene restos de cal.

Según los arqueólogos el muro podría datar de hace 500 años o 150 años.

fuente : infonortedigital

fotos : F.Naranjo y equipo ACTIN.




sábado, 14 de noviembre de 2009

APARECE UNA NECRÓPOLIS UTILIZADA DURANTE LOS PRIMEROS AÑOS DE LA COLONIZACIÓN, EN GUÍA .

La Consejería de Cultura y Patrimonio Histórico y Cultural del Cabildo de Gran Canaria, a través de la Dirección General de Patrimonio Histórico, realiza trabajos de excavación arqueológica en el lugar conocido como Finca Clavijo (en el municipio de Santa María de Guía), después de que unas labores de acondicionamiento agrícola dejaran al descubierto restos humanos que, como se ha comprobado tras las primeras catas, forman parte de un conjunto cementerial organizado. Hasta el momento, señala el arqueólogo del Cabildo Javier Velasco, se han localizado siete fosas donde ha aparecido “una muestra dispar de la población” ya que “se han localizado restos de individuos adultos de ambos sexos y niños” y no se descarta que el espacio de inhumaciones sea aún mayor. El hallazgo se produjo de manera casual mientras se instalaban canalizaciones destinadas al riego agrícola y la empresa encargada de estos trabajos avisó de inmediato a la Guardia Civil que, a su vez, alertó al servicio de Patrimonio Histórico del Cabildo, que ha asumido el coste total de la excavación por un importe inicial de 15.000 euros. La empresa encargada de realizar estas labores de recuperación de los hallazgos es Tibicena Patrimonio y Arqueología.

Junto a la alta representatividad de los restos hay que reseñar la aparición de una medalla de temática religiosa y una moneda junto a uno de los restos que permiten fechar esta inhumación en las primeras décadas del siglo XVI, lo que sitúa este enterramiento en los primeros momentos de colonización efectiva de la isla por los europeos tras la conquista. “Estamos ante un cementerio singular que no responde a los patrones habituales que tienen este tipo de espacios tras la incorporación de Gran Canaria a la Corona de Castilla”, comenta el arqueólogo. Velasco señala que la zona, próxima al casco histórico de Gáldar, sufrió una intensa ocupación prehispánica, hecho que se pone de manifiesto con la aparición de abundantes fragmentos de cerámica y piezas de obsidiana en las tierras utilizadas para los sucesivos rellenos agrícolas que se han practicado desde la colonización.

Velasco adelantó que tras la recuperación de los restos se hará un amplio estudio para determinar el rango cronológico del recinto (mediante la datación a través del Carbono 14) así como pruebas bioantropológicas que ayuden a conocer datos como el sexo, la edad, las huellas del trabajo físico, alimentación o las enfermedades que padecieron estos hombres y mujeres durante sus vidas. También se acometerá un intenso rastreo de la documentación generada durante los primeros años de la colonización europea para determinar si hay constancia escrita del lugar. Todos estos estudios arrojarán luz sobre la vida cotidiana y las relaciones sociales en la isla durante la época de referencia.

Arqueología preventiva

Javier Velasco indicó que este tipo de intervenciones pone de manifiesto la importancia de contar con instrumentos como la Carta de Riesgo Arqueológico que no sólo facilitan el trabajo a las instituciones y empresas que acometen obras en lugares con alta potencialidad de albergar vestigios del pasado, sino que ayuda a poner en práctica la Arqueología Preventiva, que preconiza la actuación previa en los yacimientos para conservarlos y preservarlos antes de que cualquier tipo de alteración del medio provoque su destrucción. En este sentido, destaca el técnico de la Consejería de Cultura y Patrimonio Histórico y Cultural del Cabildo de Gran Canaria, señaló el comportamiento responsable de la empresa Tragsa (responsable de los trabajos de acondicionamiento agrícola de la Finca Clavijo), que alertó del hallazgo de manera inmediata y ha posibilitado que los estudiosos puedan aportar más datos que ayuden a profundizar en el conocimiento de la historia de Gran Canaria.

Fuente: infonortedigital.com

miércoles, 11 de noviembre de 2009

España es una potencia mundial en arqueología submarina, disciplina que es 'la gran desconocida'



El subdirector general de Protección del Patrimonio de Ministerio de Cultura, Luis Lafuente, afirmó hoy que España es una potencia mundial en arqueología submarina, pese a que esta disciplina es "una gran desconocida".

Lafuente realizó estas declaraciones en rueda de prensa, con motivo de su participación en el curso de la Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo (UIMP) 'Tesoros, naufragios y piratas: la conservación del patrimonio cultural subacuático'.

El responsable ministerial también señaló que en la actualización de la Ley de Patrimonio Histórico, prevista por el Ministerio de Cultura, se dará al patrimonio subacuático "la importancia que tiene desde el punto de vista jurídico", lo que fomentará su conservación y protección.

Además, se pretende dar "independencia" en la regulación a la arqueología subacuática --que actualmente está regulada como la terrestre--, importancia a la arqueología de agua dulce, y recoger expresamente los principios jurídicos de la Convención de la Unesco.

Por su parte, el director del Museo Nacional de Arqueología Marina, Rafael Aznar, señaló que en septiembre se inaugurará la nueva sede del Museo Nacional de Arqueología Subacuática, que será "el primer museo del mundo" dedicado a esta disciplina, además de centro de investigación.

Aznar destacó que España ha sido el segundo país del mundo en desarrollar la arqueología científica, tras Francia, pues lleva "medio siglo" dedicado a esta materia. Al respecto, también subrayó que el país es "una potencia a nivel internacional en cuanto a instituciones y personas" dedicadas a la conservación del patrimonio, lo que hace que pueda dar "respuestas científicas" a su patrimonio.

TESOROS Y PIRATAS.

Por otra parte, ambos ponentes aludieron al título "pensado" del curso en el que toman parte en la UIMP y aclararon que "los tesoros son escasos, no hay muchos naufragios, pero sí excesivos piratas", donde reclamaron la necesidad de disponer de una política de conservación del patrimonio submarino, al tiempo que subrayaron la contraposición de la "realidad científica" de la arqueología submarina con las ideas románticas asociadas a ella.

En este sentido, Lafuente afirmó que "sí hay tesoros", pero matizó que para la arqueología submarina es "más importante" el barco fenicio de Mazarrón, "el barco entero más antiguo del mundo", que el tesoro del Odissey, porque sobre el primero no existe documentación pero "sí la hay sobre las monedas de oro".

En cuanto a los piratas, explicó que se intenta "acabar con los cazatesoros", y subrayó que aunque el patrimonio cultural de determinadas piezas "sea de España por la historia, pertenece a toda la humanidad. Se trata de conservarlo y mantenerlo para el disfrute de todos; lo que no puede ser es apropiarse de él para enriquecerse", declaró.

Por otra parte, Lafuente destacó "el espaldarazo" del Plan Nacional para la protección del patrimonio submarino, así como la dotación económica "especial" del Ministerio de Cultura, que este año asciende a 600.000 euros para protección de dicho patrimonio, y 500.000 para actos jurídicos --donde aludió al caso Odissey-- y que en 2009 se duplicará.

CANTABRIA.

A preguntas de los periodistas, el subdirector general de Protección del Patrimonio indicó que la actividad subacuática en Cantabria se realiza "desde hace muchos años" y señaló que actualmente se está trabajando en la carta arqueológica del litoral.

domingo, 8 de noviembre de 2009

Hecht Museum. Haifa. Israel.


The Reuben and Edith Hecht Museum at the University of Haifa was inaugurated in 1984. It was the initiative of the late Dr. Reuben Hecht, founder of the Dagon Silos in the port of Haifa and a founding member of the University of Haifa Board of Governors. The founding of the Museum that was to bear his and his wife's name may be cited as Dr. Hecht's crowing achievement in support of the University. He had previously established the Reuben Hecht Chair for the Study of Zionism and History and the Herzl Institute for Research and Study of Zionism. From his youth, Dr. Hecht was interested in the archaeology of the Land of Israel, and for a period of sixty years he assiduously collected archaeological artifacts representing the material culture of the Land of Israel in ancient times. He took special interest in finds from the Canaanite period to the end of the Byzantine period, a time of great significance for the Jewish people. Dr. Hecht, who was known for his Zionist activities, believed that archaeology was an important expression of Zionism and that the discovery of ancient artifacts was proof of the link between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel.
Welcome to the Hecht Museum

The Permanent Archaeological Exhibition is based on the collection of the Museum's founder, who donated it to the university. The layout of the Hecht Collection is based upon two principles: that the displays are presented both didactically and chronologically and that the collection continues to highlight the Israelite period, thereby remaining faithful to Dr. Hecht's vision.
Part of the Hecht Collection is integrated into a display arranged in chronological sequence, beginning with the Chalcolithic period and ending in the Byzantine period. Another part is integrated into a display arranged chronologically and thematically. Coins, seals, weights, jewelry, toys, oil lamps, and the 'seven species' are all exhibited with particular emphasis on two collections: Jewish coins and inscribed seals from the Biblical period. The museum's collection of ancient seals is one of the largest and most important in the field.
About two years before his death, Dr. Hecht began planning an expansion of the Museum, but he died in April 1993, before he could see the realization of his intentions. The management of the University of Haifa and the directors of the Hecht Foundation, however, continued with this initiative, and the new wing of the Museum was inaugurated in October 1998. The permanent displays in the new wing are thematic and based both on archaeological artifacts from the Hecht Collection and those on loan from the Israel Antiquities Authority. The latter include finds from excavations conducted by the University of Haifa.
The permanent thematic displays:
Phoenicians on the Northern Coast of Israel in the Biblical Period – This display stresses the role of the Phoenicians as sea-going traders and focuses on their contribution to marine architecture and the technology of harbor engineering.
Ancient Crafts and Industries – The focus of this display is on seven ancient crafts and industries: metalworking, woodworking, stone vessels, glassmaking, mosaic art, the art of writing, and the physician's craft.
The Ma'agan Mikhael Ancient Ship – The 2,400-year-old ship, its anchor, and part of its cargo are all on display.
The Art Wing of the Museum was inaugurated in early 1989. Displaying artwork from the Hecht Family Collection, this wing presents important trends in art, beginning in the 19th century. Its emphasis is on Impressionism and the work of Jewish artists in the School of Paris. Included in this collection are works by Van Gogh, Manet, Monet, Pissarro, Soutine, and Modigliani.

It might seem that the art collection is very distant in place, time, and content from the archaeological collection, but Dr. Hecht did not think so. Both the art and archaeological collections were linked to his concept of Zionism. In his view, the two movements, Impressionism and Zionism, marked the end of one period and the beginning of another; both were rooted in tradition and in the past, but led toward the future.
The new wing contains a grand and acoustically superior auditorium that seats 380. A pipe organ, which was put together from parts of organs used in churches in Israel more than a century ago, was also installed, a gift of Dr. Hecht. Its sonorous tones reflect the traditional quality, rich variety, and romantic style of 19th-century organs. As a lover of culture, Dr. Hecht hoped that the addition of the auditorium would make the Museum a center for cultural events, complementing its special atmosphere and character, which combine art and archaeology.
The Hecht Museum, in addition, serves as a study and research center for students and academic staff, as well as a venue for enrichment studies in the fields of archaeology, art, history, and the Bible for school pupils, soldiers, teachers, and all other members of the community. The Museum holds an annual competition in the plastic arts for high school pupils, soldiers, and students in the University's Department of Fine Arts. The Hecht Foundation grants scholarships to winners of these competitions, and awards fellowships to M.A. and Ph.D. students in the Departments of Archaeology and Maritime Civilizations. The Museum holds conferences, symposia, seminars, and lectures and publishes catalogues of its exhibitions of archaeology and art.
Michmanim, the museum's annual publication, publishes scholarly articles on archaeological research and on artifacts in the Museum Collection.

Ofra Rimon,
Museum Director and Curator



UNDERWATER ARCHEOLOGY.

Introduction
News in Progress of the Reassembly
Building a Replica
Introduction

Ships are unique. A ship is a microcosm of political, economic, cultural and technological activity. Why do we deem the discovery of a ship so significant? It serves as a bridge between different cultures and peoples carrying goods, ideas and technologies. As the sea is a bridge between cultures, so is the ship the means of carrying and diffusing that culture. Comprehending the technological achievements embodied in the building of a ship, its navigation, its method of propulsion, its loading capacity and its constant confrontation with the elements is a major task. Until very recently, the structure of ancient ships was a subject relying on literary descriptions and artistic iconographic representations. However, with the progress of nautical archaeology research, we can now handle a ship's hull itself, enabling us to begin to understand the magnitude of the achievements of the ancients.

Such was the case with the Ma'agan Mikhael Ship - a fortuitous discovery accompanied by a dramatic touch of coincidence. The ship was found off the shore of Kibbutz Ma'agan Mikhael, a settlement situated approximately 30 km south of Haifa on the Israeli coastline, where three decades earlier, maritime archaeology in Israel was initiated.

Oddly enough, this stretch of sandy sea bottom had not shown any signs of significant archaeological relics, even though the sea along this stretch of coast had served as the training ground for naval divers who joined the Archaeological Undersea Exploration Society of Israel and therefore spent many hours underwater while practicing search and survey techniques for archaeology. In August of 1985, a member of the Kibbutz, Ami Eshel, was returning late one afternoon from a dive along the coast. Some 70 meters offshore, at a depth of less than 1.5 meters of water, he came across a pile of large stones.

He spotted pottery sherds and several pieces of wood protruding from the sand. The stones were not typical of the region and the pottery appeared ancient. In addition, it became immediately clear that the 'finger' of wood protruding from the sand reached much farther down than he could uncover with his bare hands. Thus it occurred to him that he may have stumbled upon much more.

Following customary procedures, he notified a representative of the Israel Antiquities Authority of his finds, and went to find Dr. Elisha Linder, the maritime historian/archaeologist who lives on the kibbutz. Linder realized that the find was an intact, 2,400-year-old wooden-hulled merchantman, originally 13.5 meters in length and 4 meters in width, in a remarkable state of preservation. It was lying perpendicular to the shore where it had, for reasons still unknown, been beached.

The excavation process took place over three seasons, from 1988 to 1989. It was carried out by a team of nautical archaeologists and technical staff from the Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies at the University of Haifa, who were joined by specialists and advisors from Israel and abroad. Jay Rosloff from the U.S.A served as the field director.

A substantial portion of the wooden hull structure survived. Among the artifacts found aboard were 70 items of ceramic ware, ropes, a lead ingot, a set of wooden carpenter's tools, 12 tons of rocks, mainly blue schist and Gabro, and - lying in position in the sandy bottom, although it had not actually been used - a perfectly intact, one-armed wooden anchor, unique in its style, its ropes still attached.







News in Progress of the Reassembly

Where planks had become distorted, they have been reshaped. Each piece of planking, after being submerged for a night in PEG at 60°C to render it flexible, was eased into the original shape and held in place using battens and clamps. This jigsaw puzzle was made easier by the original labeling (stainless steel needles and Dymo tape), which survived the years of the conservation process and all the handling to which the parts were subjected.

The remaining pieces will be put in place when an overhead gantry is installed to allow the assembly team to work inside the hull while being suspended from above.







Building a Replica of the Ma'agan Mikhael Ancient Ship

In order to advance the study of shipping in antiquity and to extend our knowledge of the Ma'agan Mikhael Ship, the plan is to build a replica of this ship. It will be built by an identical method of "shell-first construction," with similar materials to those utilized by the ancient shipwright. The intention is to sail this replica across the Mediterranean Sea, making use of ancient navigation means and methods. Similar replication ventures of historical ships have been undertaken in other seafaring countries: our Greek colleagues constructed a full-scale replica of the 4th century BCE merchantship discovered and excavated near Kyrenia, Cyprus. The Danes built replicas of Viking ships at the Maritime Archaeological Museum and Research Center in Roskilde, Denmark.

Students and scientists of various maritime study disciplines, from Israel and from different countries bordering the Mediterranean shores, will board the Ma'agan Mikhael Ship replica along its sailing route. Thus, this ancient new ship will also serve as an ambassador of goodwill and peace and enhance collaboration with neighboring countries. With the establishment of a laboratory workshop for students studying maritime archaeology, a truly unique opportunity has been created: namely, that both students and researchers can be totally involved in the building of a replica of the Ma'agan Mikhael Ancient Ship. The workshop will impart to the students the academic/technical/mechanical skills required for investigating methods in this field and presenting physical replicas and academic reports.
















Photos: Itamar Grinberg

Visita en 360º : link





THE MUSEUM OF THE ROMAN SHIP. El puerto de Claudio.

The Port of Claudius

The river port of Ostia and the harbour of Pozzuoli had constituted the two poles of Rome's harbour system throughout the entire Republican period. While the second harbour was too distant and difficult to reach, the river port at Ostia was unsuitable and inadequate to manage the large volume of commercial trade because it only featured a single quay. Large-tonnage vessels were obliged to trans-ship their merchandise onto smaller boats towed by pairs of oxen up to Rome (the 'tracking' system).

The capital, which was growing demographically, suffered serious problems regarding food supply, particularly during the winter season. Claudius' predecessors had already attempted to resolve the problem of Rome's harbour: Julius Caesar had plans drawn up for radical changes to the river course to increase the river's navigability, which were never carried out, while Augustus considered a solution regarding the river mouth.

In the end the emperor Claudius decided to have an artificial harbour constructed, but the project was not well-received because of the enormous expenses involved in such an operation. Furthermore, the dangerously close Tiber would rapidly carry large quantities of silt, inhibiting the smooth functioning of the entire structure. Despite these reservations, the selected site was established at about 3 km north of the Tiber mouth. Half the basin was excavated in dry land, after which the construction progressed with the extension of two long moles out into the open sea, reaching out like pincers to embrace a wide expanse. A lighthouse was constructed using as foundations the scuttled ship which Caligula had had built to transport the obelisk for the Vatican Circus.

This was an enormous vessel that had a capacity of over 1000 metric tons and which, because of its dimensions, took up most of the left mole, according to Pliny the Elder. Other authors, including Suetonius and Dio Cassius, describe an island instead. Several canals, or ditches, were opened in 46 A.D. An attempt was made to reduce the risks of flooding by artificially connecting the last loop of the Tiber to the sea. Only in 64 A.D. was the harbour completed by Nero, who had commemorative coins minted for the occasion. In addition to the silting problem, the future of the enormous basin had already been marked by another calamity: Tacitus informs us that in 62 A.D. a storm sunk or incapacitated at least 200 transport vessels, while another hundred which had sought shelter along the Tiber were lost in a fire. The event underscored the scarce dependability of the harbour. Between 100 and 112 A.D. Trajan intervened with a new project which involved the excavation of a large basin that lay inland with respect to the Claudian harbour. The latter remained in use, perhaps with the more limited function of providing shelter within the harbour.

The Topography of the Claudian Port

Despite the substantial survival of ancient structures, the reconstruction of the port of Claudius, particularly in its southern portion, is based on evidence derived from interpretations of aerial photographs and from the study of the harbour area as represented in Renaissance cartography. From these sources we can infer that the ancient harbour basin was orientated towards the southwest with a large mole protecting it from maestrale (NW), ponente (W) and libeccio (SW) winds, prevailing weather conditions which are shared by the majority of harbours along the central Tyrrhenian coastline. The principal entrance was at the west end while the southern entrance is to be found at the height of the modern road to Fiumicino. The left mole extended along the minor branch of the Tiber where nineteenth century excavations exposed traces of concrete cores. Between the main entrance and the probable southern one, aerial photography delineates an elongated ovoid area that is much broader than the moles, which could correspond to the location of the lighthouse. The basin area is of considerable dimensions, measuring on the order of over 1200 m. by 1300 m., which corresponds to an area of approximately 150 hectares. From aerial photographs it is possible to distinguish a long and sinuous dark shape, commencing at the head of the right-hand mole and connecting to the Trajan’s hexagon, which corresponds to the port’s entrance channel.

Archaeological remains

The discernible remains of the right mole of the Claudian harbour, excavated in 1957, are visible behind the Museum of the Roman Ships, to the left. The structure extends for about one kilometre towards the west, is crossed by the Fiumicino Airport road and F. De Pinedo street, and continues within the airport enclosure itself. The wooden caissons utilised for the construction of the mole left evident traces in the concrete jetties. It is possible to discern the posts fitted along the external perimetre of the caissons (utilised to anchor them to the seabed), as well as their connection to the transversal beams - whose cavities had formerly been interpreted as negative traces of the deck beams of Caligula’s ship -and to the containment bulkheads of the concrete jetty. This construction system for offshore moles was described by Vitruvius and is well documented along the Tyrrhenian coast. Within the airport enclosure the mole conserves the sea-eroded remains of travertine blocks. Behind the museum towards the right, it is possible to visit a building whose walls alternate courses of brickwork and tufa blocks, the so-called Harbour Master’s Office (second century A.D.). Its function remains unclear, although it most likely constituted a service building situated at the end of the basin. There are still traces of painted decoration within the building. Proceeding along A. Guidoni street towards the exit to the Rome-Fiumicino highway, on the right, one can see the archaeological area of Monte Giulio which offers an impressive overview across most of the internal area of the Claudian port basin and where other structures facing the basin have been brought to light: a cistern, some public baths and several storage buildings. These structures, whose foundations are likely to be contemporary to the construction of the right mole, are dated to the second century A.D. and also feature later additions.

The Ships of Fiumicino - The History of Their Discovery

The vessels currently displayed in the Museum of the Roman Ships came to light during the construction of the "L. Da Vinci" international airport of Fiumicino. They were excavated and recovered under the direction of the then inspector of the Rome Archaeological Superintendency, Dott.ssa V. Santa Maria Scrinari. The wrecks were found abutting the right mole of the Claudian harbour in a marginal area of the basin which was particularly susceptible to silting. We can hypothesise that in ancient times there must have been a veritable "cemetery" where boats and ships too old and in too poor condition to be of service were abandoned.

In the majority of cases it is the bottom portion of the hull which survived, due to its having become waterlogged and subsequently sealed beneath the silt deposits from the harbour. In several points the submerged portions, not yet covered by sand and lime, were attacked by wood-boring organisms such as shipworms. In addition, the blackened appearance of the hulls is a result of carbonisation or reduction processes activated by microorganisms living within the sedimentation layers.

The discovery of the first vessel, Fiumicino 2 (Oneraria Maggiore 11), dates to 1958. In the following year excavations brought to light Fiumicino I (Oneraria Maggiore 1), Fiumicino 3 (Oneraria Minore 1) and Fiumicino 5 (the Fisherman's Boat), in addition to two fragments of hull sides which however were unrelated to any of the other hulls. The last hull, Fiumicino 4 (Oneraria Minore 11), was discovered in 1965. At first the timber structures, left exposed to the open air, suffered significant degradation; consequently to reduce these processes they were covered with mats, sand and canvas. Subsequently an annular ditch was excavated around the perimetre of each wreck and, radiating from this, transversal passages beneath each keel. In this manner it was possible to construct a timber camber with which to support the hull sides and to recover the vessels in their entirety. Transported to the interior of the museum under construction, the Istituto Centrale del Restauro (the Central Institute of Conservation) in Rome ensured the necessary consolidation measures, utilising a mixture of resins. Finally, following the definitive display of the vessels on supporting steel frames, the museum was opened to the public on November l0th, 1979.

The Ships of Fiumicino – Archaeology and Wooden Shipbuilding

The exceptional collection of vessels preserved at the museum of Fiumicino not only enriches our knowledge of the various ship types utilised starting in the Imperial period, but also allows us to admire the construction methodologies employed by ancient shipwrights. The ancient shipbuilding sequence was completely different from the current procedure seen in the Mediterranean region, which requires arranging an internal skeleton (frames) along a keel, which is subsequently covered with a skin of planking (the so-called "skeleton-firsf' construction). During the GraecoRoman era, instead, the outer shell of planks was constructed directly after laying the keel. The internal skeleton was only inserted later, to function as internal support (the so-called "shell-first" construction). Joinery between planking consisted of tenons, thin tongues of hardwood, inserted into apposite grooves (mortises) cut within the plank thickness.

The tenons were then locked with pegs or treenails. In this way, the self-supporting planking could maintain the desired shape and acquired an exceptional solidity. The five boats of Fiumicino were constructed according to the principles of shell-first construction, a system that is well represented in the Fiumicino 4 vessel (end of secondthird centuries A.D.) which displays a great homogeneity in its mortiseand-tenon joinery. On the other hand Fiumicino 1 and 2, sister vessels, document the use of distinctive constructive methodologies.

Amongst the more significant characteristics worthy of note, in addition to the massive use of iron nails to connect the planking to the skeleton frame, we highlight the use of bolts to join several floor timbers to the keel, and the considerable spacing between tenons, or even the actual absence of any plank joinery at all. These features indicate, amongst other things, the vessels' late date (fourth-fifth centuries A.D.). The form and construction characteristics reflect the diverse functions of the Fiumicino ships. The elegant angular profile of the Fiumicino 4 hull made it suitable for small- and medium-range coastal navigation at sea, given its modest dimensions (about 15 in. in length). The mast step to seat the foot of the mast demonstrates that the vessels had been fitted with a single square sail. A pump to remove bilge water is located in a socket within the crutches flanking the mast step. The internal planking serves to strengthen the structure longitudinally and to protect the hull from the cargo, typically composed of terracotta amphorae (two-handled jars). Fiumicino 5, a unique find of its kind for the Roman period (second century A.D.), is instead a small fishing boat featuring a central compartment within which to store and keep the freshly fished cath alive, thanks to the sea water that could be made to flood the cavity through stoppered holes along the bottom hull planking. Fiumicino 1, 2 and 3, which share similar constructional characteristics, feature rather flat wide hulls which indicate they were used for river transport. They must have been towed by animals along the right bank of the river according to a propulsion system known as "tracking", still in use along the Tiber river in the nineteenth century. Their original form can be appreciated by examining the numerous representations (on mosaics, reliefs and frescoes) of a particular family of naves caudicariae.

Daily Life on Board and Ship Equipment

Knowing about the rules and conventions that regulated life on board in ancient times is possible thanks to the analysis of written sources as well as the study of objects found on shipwrecks. In the latter case, the information is first-hand and speaks to us directly about life on board. We can learn about how the crew ate from the cooking equipment, which often preserves traces of burning, or from the tableware. On the Byzantine ship of Yassiada (Turkey), remains of the hearth, cooking utensils comprising various terracotta and bronze containers, a mortar, and food remains (animal bones) were recovered in the stem cabin. Similar finds have been made on numerous other shipwrecks that have often yielded examples of hand grindstones to make flour from cereals and thus to prepare cornmeal, soups or breads. The crew's provisions were stored in containers such as amphorae, baskets or sacks. The supply for a voyage included liquid foods (drinking water, wine, oil and garum [fish paste] and solid foods (cereals, olives, fresh or dried fruit, legumes, smoked or salted meats). Personal objects belonging to the crew or to passengers might also be stored in the cabin: clothes, shoes, rings or playing dice which, kept in little boxes or bags, helped to while away the time at sea. Medicines against seasickness were not lacking, while coins and lever scales would be used for commercial transactions, once dry land was reached. For illumination they often used oil-lamps. As religious customs were not ignored by mariners, small portable altars and images of divinities were set up on board ship. During navigation the crew, if not engaged in manoeuvres, would be involved in maintenance activities such as repairing sails with bone needles, or fishing, to enrich the modest food supply with fresh produce.

The excavation of shipwrecks allows us, at least in part, to learn about ship equipment, although the main source of information regarding most of the structures above the waterline and the rigging comes from depictions of ancient vessels (iconography). In fortunate cases wooden sail blocks, or fragments of sails and ropes, are actually recovered. One of the most common items of equipment, which however is often found in isolation, is the sounding lead. With its hollow underside filled with resin, the mariner could establish the nature and depth of the seabed as well as follow a route and recognise the best anchorages. The anchor was the most important piece of equipment on board, and usually each vessel had several of various sizes.

In Roman times anchors were constructed of wood with a lead stock for weight, or else they were made entirely of iron.



Visiting the Museum of the Roman ships

Now the Museum is situated at South of the Intercontinental Airport of Fiumicino and is connected to the city of Rome by motorway and railway. The structure of the Museum is absolutely functional: a big container 33,5 m long and 22 wide constitutes a sort of shipshed. Along the left side there are offices and service rooms.

Originally the exhibition pavilion was used as shelter for the salvaged ships. Here the hulls were conserved with resins and the damaged wooden parts were restored.
As soon as they enter the museum, viewers can survey the entire collection of ancient vessels at a single glance. The ships are supported by metal frames designed with as few pieces as possible in order to hold the delicate wooden remains intact without distorting the architectural lines of the boats.

At the entrance, to the right, the first exhibit is Fiumicino 5, the fishing boat. Vessels similar to this one in their construction have not yet been found, making the relic the only one of this kind in the world. It has also an aquarium-container located in the mid-section, while the bottom of this well has openings to let in sea water. In this way the fish caught could be kept alive until the return of the ship and their eventual sale.

If we turn toward the entrance we can see a pair of fragments from the hulls of boats of which nothing else has survived. One of these has two wales conserved.
Returning from the direction in which we came in, Fiumicino 3 is to be found to the left of the entrance. Only the only flat bottom of this little fluvial barge, massively reconstructed in modern times, remains.

A small corridor separates this barge from the cargo ship Fiumicino 4, the best preserved of the small fleet of the museum. The hull is conserved above the waterline.
To the right and to the left pieces of lapidary stone are displayed, including fragments from a sarcophagus with maritime scenes, architectonic elements, a mooring bollard and a quarry block.

Of interest on the rear wall are the reproductions of a relief from the Torlonia collection depicting the port with ships in movement (IIIrd cent. A.D.) and a copy of the Museo Nazionale Romano relief that shows a navis caudicaria, a special type of towed vessel used to transport cargo from the port of Rome up to the city.
Leaving aside the materials in the display cases, we move on to Fiumicino 1 and 2, the large flat bottomed fluvial barges. At the beginning of the corridor separating the two ships is a travertine capital found at the port of Claudius near the outlet of Trajan's canal.

In the display cases, we can see materials salvaged from the excavation of the ships and found in other excavations in the area. On the short wall to the rear and along the wall leading to the exit, visitors will finds panels illustrating in chronological order the various stages of the digs carried out in 1950-1960 and slides show examples of Roman ports in the Mediterranean.
Finally, large maps illustrate the principal routes of ancient times, as well as other major finds in European naval archaeology.

Text by: Giulia Boetto
Translation by: Claire Calcagno
Photos and documentation: Archives of the SAO

Ministry of the Cultural Activities and Heritage
Archaeological Superintendency of Ostia
Via dei Romagnoli 717 - 00119 Ostia Antica
Tel. (06) 56358099 - Fax (06) 5651500
Internet site: http://itnw.roma.it/ostia/scavi
E-mail: ostia.scavi@agora.stm.it

Museum of the Roman Ships
Via A. Guidoni 35 - 00050 Fiumicino Aeroporto (RM)
Tel. (06) 6529192 - Fax (06) 65010089
E-mail: museo.navi@agora.stm.it

Opening times:


From 10.02.2002 onwards, the Museum is closed for visitors, due to reconstruction works.


The first Saturday and last Sunday of every month: departure from the Museum at 9:30 for the guided tour covering the archaeological area of Portus. For all other dates, a reservation is require. It is possible to visit the archaeological areas of Monte Giulio and the so-called Harbour Master's Office by prior telephone request.

M U S E O N A V A L E R O M A N O

Albenga

La sezione di archeologia sottomarina, ospitata nel Palazzo Peloso Cepolla, pregevole edificio del primo Seicento, è sorta nel 1950 in seguito al ritrovamento, sui fondali dell'isola Gallinaria, di una nave oneraria degli inizi del 1 sec. a.C. Nel Museo, in corso di risistemazione, sono esposti resti dello scafo, e materiali recuperati durante le varie campagne di scavo, e soprattutto un gran numero di anfore vinarie, collocate secondo la disposizione originaria del carico.

Altri reperti provengono dal relitto della nave romana di Diano Marina, tra i quali spiccano alcuni doliola, grandi contenitori in terracotta. Nel Palazzo è ospitata anche la Collezione di vasi in ceramica savonese dell'antica Farmacia dell'Ospedale di Albenga, comprendente un centinaio di esemplari, dalla caratteristica decorazione bianco-blu, prodotti a Savona e ad Albissola tra il XVII e il XIX secolo.

Orari: (dal martedì alla domenica)

Estivo 9,30-12,30 / 15,30-19,30

Invernale 10-12,30 / 14,30-18

Indirizzo: Palazzo Peloso Cipolla, Piazza S. Michele 12, Albenga (SV)

Telefono: 0182.51215

Fax: 0182.570434


LA NAVE ROMANA DI ALBENGA

Il relitto della Nave Romana di Albenga è il più famoso tra tutti quelli scoperti finora nel Mediterraneo occidentale, perchè su di esso sono stati effettuati, dal 1950, i primi lavori di recupero di anfore con l'intervento della nave "Artiglio", e i primi rilievi sistematici dei resti di una nave oneraria romana, destinata al trasporto delle merci. Essa si ritrova ad un miglio dalla costa, a 42 metri di profondità, dinanzi all'antica città di Albingaunum (Albenga).

E' stata oggetto di tredici campagne di scavo subacqueo che hanno consentito di documentare gradualmente gli elementi del carico e le caratteristiche costruttive dello scafo. E' stato pure accertato che si tratta della più grande nave da trasporto romana conosciuta a tutt'oggi nel Mediterraneo, con un carico superiore alle 10.000 anfore, e quindi con una portata netta di 450/500 tonnellate. Le anfore contenevano vino proveniente dalla Campania destinato ai mercati della Francia meridionale e della Spagna. Insieme al vino veniva esportata la ceramica a vernice nera e altri tipi di vasellame.

Sono stati pure recuperati oggetti di uso personale dell'equipaggio e della scorta armata di bordo (elmi), quest'ultima necessaria per difendersi dai pirati che infestavano soprattutto le coste liguri. Tutti gli elementi raccolti permettono di datare il naufragio della Nave Romana di Albenga tra il 100 e il 90 a.C., momento che coincide con la concessione del diritto latino alle popolazioni liguri, con la romanizzazione della regione e con il conseguente sviluppo delle città.